Showing posts with label Deerhoof. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Deerhoof. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

2020 Album Preview Series Part 4: To Vet During the Threat

Previews of upcoming 2020 listening, including: Field Music – Making a New World (2020) DIIV – Deceiver (2019) Craig Armstrong- The Incredible Hulk Original Score (2008) Deerhoof – The Runner’s Four (2005) The Aristocrats – You Know What…? (2019) Shana Cleveland – Night of the Worm Moon (2019)


Relevant Links
Previous review of Field Music’s Plumb Previous review of My Bloody Valentine’s Loveless
Introduction to the Superhero Theme Project
Recalling a cold night with Deerhoof The 2020 Playlist grows:


Sunday, October 27, 2013

Zorch and the Surreal Bagpiper

I wasn’t sure what to expect from the downtown nightlife in Tuscon, but it was much more vibrant than I expected. There were crowds of people moving around each other, drawn endlessly in and out of bars and clubs while bands blared cover tunes off the rooftops. I was interested in nothing more than a glass of iced tea, so I quickly grew tired of weaving in and out of the mob. I finally meandered into an upscale coffeehouse called Sparkroot, ordered some mint tea sweetened with agave, and settled down with my laptop to blog.

From this vantage point, the diversity of the quirky throng became apparent. Gender-bending cross-dressers and stroller-pushing moms sidled up by each other at vendor stands sharing their anticipation of an upcoming comic-con while mustached hipsters and their girlfriends sipped clear and (I assume) potent drinks from tiny glasses. It all seemed quite normal. No one even seemed particularly surprised when bagpipe and drum ensemble marched up to the street corner and began blaring out Amazing Grace.

It’s not that people weren’t appreciative – they whooped and hollered and took pictures like they would at any good street performance. They just didn’t seem that surprised. I, on the other hand, was stunned and somewhat upset that my phone was back at the hotel recharging. It was too surreal to believe – and it just got weirder when one of the bagpipers noticed the sticker on my laptop.

The sticker has a few bars of piano music and says, in big black letters, “IF YOU CAN READ THIS, THANK A MUSIC TEACHER.” When I am out in public, it is not uncommon for me to catch people reading it and share a knowing insider’s glance. This piper caught sight of it, however, and disarmingly strode up to me. Flustered, I awkwardly complimented his group’s performance, but his blank, serious expression did not waver. I was determined not to be intimidated by a man in a kilt, but then I noticed his pupils subtly swirling and changing shape…

I was horrified and slightly dizzy. Without breaking his gaze, he reached behind his beard into his jacket, seemingly farther than normal physics would allow, and pulled out a CD. He placed it carefully on the keyboard of my laptop, turned on his heels, and strode off to catch up with his ensemble.  I looked down at the CD and my blood ran cold. It was ZZorchh, the debut release from local Austin band Zorch.



I have followed this psychedelic noise pop band since I stumbled upon their ear-splitting performance at the Deerhoof after-show. They made such an impression on me back then on that frigid night that I downloaded their demo EP and rather enjoyed it, but like most short-form collections, I had a hard time getting it to compare favorably to other things I was listening to in the long term. I had been considering buying this full-length since I heard of its release for quite awhile – and there it was.

In my recent review of the F*ck Buttons, I bemoaned what I saw as the general lack of technical ability in music that features sonic innovation. Back in the day, artists like Rick Wakeman married technique with technology using Moog synthesizers and the like. Zorch addresses this issue. They manipulate technology in a way that opens up an incredibly broad musical palette, especially for a duo, but their music feels risky in a way that places the controls in human hands.



The resulting chaos is breathtaking. I find it hard not to make comparisons to Frank Zappa, especially due to the frenetic drumming. Certainly, Zorch accesses a tounge in cheek surrealism that was characteristic of a late-70s Zappa band, minus the overt social satire.  The band's use of keyboards and computer assistance is decidedly contemporary, however, rather like Animal Collective collaborating with Terry Bozzio.  A frightening, overstimulating combination, to be sure, but compelling nonetheless.

As far as the means by which I acquired the album, I calmly finished my tea and  made my way back to the hotel as if nothing happened.  There is definitely a point at which reality and surreality mixed that evening, but even now, looking back on it, the details are unclear.  You can figure it out for yourself if you really feel the need.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

A Quick Word About Zorch

We were headed to the car after the Deerhoof show (I promise I’ll let it go after this) when we heard some electronic ruckus coming from the Mohawk’s inside room.  It sounded like some kind of post-90s rave freakout, but with the undeniable sound of live, and very active, drumming. It literally stopped us in our tracks.  Our interest must have been obvious, because a person walking by nonchalantly muttered to us “they’re pretty badass, actually.”  We decided to go back in and check it out.

The band playing inside, which I recently tracked down, was a local Austin band called Zorch.  Like Ben Butler and Mousepad, Zorch is a high-tech drum and keyboard duo, but their approach was much less funky and much more intense.  They were dishing out some really amazing musicianship, actually, but inside that little room at the Mohawk the performance was nothing short of ear-bleedingly, painfully loud.  I actually think that I felt parts of my hearing being erased by standing in the room.   Check out this video – except imagine it at, like, jet engine decibel level.


Obviously, as a duo with a pretty full sound, there is some automation happening in Zorch’s music, but if you watch the video carefully it allows you to see how the tech never runs amok as an end in itself – just like it oughta be.  The keyboardist sets up the arpeggiation to keep the intensity up while focusing on other aspects of the song (bassline, etc).  For the drummer, of course, it’s no secret.  His feverishly Bozzio-esuque hyperactivity rises to the challenge of keeping up with the machinery.

So, even though I did not stay long at their show (out of self-defense for my hearing), Zorch made enough of an impression on me to look up almost a month later.  I downloaded their EP earlier this week, and it captures them.  If you are turned off by the poppier aspects of my blog entries and want something a little more experimental, you’ll like them – it’s got my interest this week.  Plus it’s free. Furthermore, after acquainting myself with the recording, I think that I might be open to checking them out live again, only armed with earplugs this time.

Saturday, February 19, 2011

Smoke and Mirrors: Deerhoof, Ratatat, and Live Persona

Not too long ago, the sound of a person’s voice was never far removed from his or her mouth.  With telephones, computers, and speakers lurking in virtually every corner of our existence, that idea seems almost laughably quaint.  Today, it hardly seems miraculous that I can talk to my wife across town without actually physically being there.  That we take this for granted has significant ramifications on our musical consumption.  In the midst of all of the smoke-and-mirrors that follow the recording process, it is particularly easy to forget that music is generated by human hands.  The studio version of a song is a fixed ideal, and is often not reproducible in a live performance.

For me, however, a band's live persona is an important component of the overall listening experience.  It does more than just put a face on the musicians – it also allows me to see the musician’s conception of their own music.  When I went to see Deerhoof in January at the “coldest show ever,” I hoped I would be able to better appreciate their recorded output, an investment which is just now starting to pay off.

For the musically curious, which is who this blog is supposed to be for, I would suggest "Deerhoof vs. Evil" as a good entry point for the band.  It has been in regular rotation ever since that show, and something is starting to happen with me and that recording that is hard to describe.  Yesterday I woke up with this little ditty firmly planted in my internal radio.  The video showcases Satomi's quirky "Laurie Anderson meets the grunge scene" persona.


Studio versions of songs are often unrealistic in a live setting, though.  Some bands hire extra musicians who were not part of the creative process to recreate the studio on stage.  Deerhoof takes a different approach, stripping the song down to its barest persisting essence so that it can be performed by the group’s core members.  I attribute my new perception of "Deerhoof vs. Evil" to a conceptual framework provided by seeing them perform live.

For comparison, here's a pretty good amateur clip of "Super Duper Rescue Heads!" from that January show.  Check out the similarities and differences between this live version and the version from the "official" video, particularly in the drums and guitars. 



On the flip side, some styles of music are created entirely in the studio, and live performances are complicated by the expectations of the original.  For example, if it seems like I am sort of on an electronic music kick, I squarely place the blame on the duo Ratatat.  Back in the day, if I liked a group, I would avidly collect all of their albums.  I am less inclined to do that these days, but Ratatat is the first “band” (if a duo can even be a band) in awhile that has me eyeballing their entire catalog.  I got “LP4” last Fall, and that is as good a place as any to start if you are curious. Be prepared, though: within months, I got “LP3” (which has a surprise on it for Horror Remix fans) and I just put “Classics” in rotation.  Ratatat’s sliding guitars, swirling melodies, and hallucinogenic beats keep me coming back for more.



Beyond this rather superficial description, however, it is difficult to stylistically pin Ratatat down.  Late 80’s electronic pioneers The Art of Noise come to mind, although Ratatat is definitely more West Coast and less British.  Mike Stroud’s guitar work suggests the epic walls of guitar that Brian May built with Queen, but within an electronic context reminiscent of Daft Punk (yeah, THOSE guys again).

Now granted, I might not be the best authority on Ratatat’s performance practice.  I was looking forward to seeing them live, but the show was sold out by the time I got around to getting a ticket.  That’s the price I pay for procrastinating. As a duo with pretty complicated music that is known for a good live show, though, it does beg the question: how do they render their music in a performance setting?  From what I have gathered, Ratatat employs sequencing to fill out parts that cannot be covered or that are impossible to acoustically recreate.  To draw attention away from this aspect of their performances, they meet the smoke-and-mirrors head-on by putting on an audio-visual lightshow spectacle.


There was a time in my life when I would have been critical of this "play-along" approach, but as sequencers become ever more reactive, I have come to appreciate the emergent specialized musicianship that accommodates them.  On the one hand, Ratatat showcases guitar in a way that humanizes their performances.  Beyond that, for Ratatat (and for Rush, too, for that matter), virtual instruments allow the musicians who are primarily involved in the creative process to perform at a level that compares favorably to the expectations set by the studio recording.  Ratatat's music is essentially larger-than-life, and to strip this away for a live performance would fundamentally change what the band is about.

This final clip is a Deerhoof encore, of sorts. It catches Greg's monologue on the weather, Satomi's attempt to get feeling back in her hands, plumes of steam coming from the band's mouths...and of course, an energetic performance that would be difficult to capture in the studio.


  
Finally, in other news, I am considering offering prizes for musical suggestions that contribute to the blog.  Keep your ears open.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Deerhoof, Ben Butler & Mousepad - and Let's Not Forget the Cold

In the summer of 2007, I saw Rush on the “Snakes and Arrows” tour at an outdoor venue, the Smirnoff Center in Dallas (or whatever they are calling it this year).  It was an outdoor show in the middle of a particularly bad Texas heatwave – heat index 108 degrees after sundown.  Last night, I experienced its counterpart when I was Deerhoof at the Mohawk here in Austin.  When I left the venue, my phone said that it was 27 degrees.  I had on some serious layers on my torso, but of course, no thermal underwear.  Its hard to find that kind of thing when you only wear them once every two years.  I can’t imagine what it must have been like to play in that environment.  I had wool socks on my hands, which were planted firmly in my pockets, and they still were numb.  When the wind chill hit, I started looking for a Tauntaun (nerdboy reference). 

Deerhoof is an interesting band.  While they are probably not bombastic enough to earn the “prog” label, they are certainly quirky enough to be considered “art rock.”  Something about them that reminds me of the Talking Heads - perhaps Satomi Matsuzaki’s awkward Japaneseness reminds me of the ways in which David Byrne used to capitalize on his own whiteboy gawkiness.  Unarguably, Deerhoof has better technical chops than the Talking Heads.  Drummer Greg Saunier takes a page from the Keith Moon playbook, rifling out seat-of-the-pants fills just to see what he can pull off.



Last summer I picked up “Milkman,” and it was definitely a slow cooker, but I came to like it after many, many listens.  There is something that is missing, though, that keeps Deerhoof from being a favorite, rather than just an interest.  Trying to find out what that thing is might be what keeps me listening to them.  The point of going to see them live was to perhaps gain a better understanding of the band, and although I walked away satisfied, I can’t say that I am any more or less a Deerhoof fan than when I started.  I still just like them.  To be fair, I got their new release “Deerhoof vs. Evil” last week, and it comprised the majority of their set.  That recording is still simmering for me, and admittedly, it does sound a little different after the show.  Additionally, I was not familiar with a lot of the work that they played.  I have one other album, while they have an extensive catalog that spans around fifteen years.  Being kind of a weird band on an oppressively cold night, the whole thing may not have invigorated my interest in the group like I thought it might, but it might not have been a fair sample.

On the other hand, maybe it is fair.  When I walked in the door, the opening band, who I had never heard of before, immediately caught and held my attention.  Comprised of a keyboard player and a drummer, this group, calling themselves “Ben Butler & Mousepad,” totally blew me out of the water.  I have tried to find a clip that represents this group well, but unfortunately they all seem to be like the one I personally tried to capture – OK video, but totally blown-out sound.  This one kind of gives you an idea....


Keep in mind the drummer probably can't feel his hands here.  For a better live tidbit, check out my later post.

The thing that really disturbed me about the overall experience, however, was that after Ben Butler and Mousepad, Deerhoof seemed a little….archaic.  Despite the Deerhoof’s killer chops and impressive energy in a hostile environment, their guitar-centric approach left me a little cold (pun intended).  Conversely, the keyboard and drum approach of Ben Butler and Mousepad fascinated me. 

One of the things I enjoy about music is unraveling the tapestry of its performance.  Figuring out who plays what part at what time is very satisfying to me, and kept me listening to some songs for years.  When you add this new wave of “soft” sequencing, where laptops can be made to react more like instruments, I find myself really curious as to how it is being done.

Keyboard and laptops present another problem, however – that of stage presence.  It is difficult to make keyboard playing and computer-controlled accompaniment look cool.  Ben Butler and Mousepad deftly circumvented this problem by employing hyperactive drumming and charismatic crowd interaction, allowing their music to bridge the gap between Keith Emerson and Thomas Dolby.  Although they were danceable, they were also virtuosic, adventurous, and above all, fun.  Any group who tries to get the audience to clap and dance to a song in 9/4 has the kind of Zappa-esque humor that I appreciate.    

I bought their CD "Formed for Fantasy" and, predictably, it does not quite capture the live performance, although it does have its moments.  Once I get some distance from last night, I might be able to be a little more objective.

Finally, a portion of Deerhoof’s performance was also marred by some drunk guy with an accent and a microphone whose enthusiastic thrashing about was encroaching on my space.  Of course, I became annoyed, and when he turned to speak to his girlfriend I took great joy in barking into his microphone like a junkyard dog.  I’m pretty sure he never actually caught me doing it.  Regardless things improved when I made the miraculous realization that I could pretty much stand wherever I wanted to.  After I moved about five feet back, he became someone else’s problem and I got back to enjoying the show.  Lesson learned.